Former Toyota Motorist accused Toyota of hiding over 300 accidents
Whose lies?
Toyota hides more than 300 lawsuits over the accident
In the United States, Toyota was accused by former employees of concealing 300 overturn accidents and suffered the greatest credibility crisis in history. In this incident, no matter who lied, it was tantamount to throwing a bomb at the other side.
Is there another Toyota?
A 75-page indictment caused Toyota Motor Japan to once again become involved in the whirlpool of quality. If the content of the lawsuit is true, the credibility crisis it involves will be the most serious in Toyota's history.
The world’s largest automaker was accused of concealing and destroying information related to more than 300 car-to-car crashes and fatalities to evade legal violations of its vehicles in engineering design and safety testing.
It was not the customer who filed the lawsuit but Dimitrios P. Biller, a former employee of Toyota Motor North America.
On April 15, 2003, Buhler joined Toyota Motor Corporation as a member of the National Management Board of the Toyota Motor Rollover Incident Investigation. This status has increased the association of the industry to the authenticity of the contents of the lawsuit. The news shows that Biller served for Toyota Motor Corporation USA until 2007.
This thick indictment was actually submitted on July 24, 2009 to the California Central District Court in Los Angeles. The Central District Court in California held its first hearing on September 14.
After the incident was exposed, Toyota’s US side denied it, arguing that Biller’s statement was not correct and that the indictment contained a partially misleading element. But the cautious stance offered by the Toyota U.S. Attorneys Group is intriguing. They said, "Bell has no right to disclose such a high level of trade secrets."
The author has mastered the indictment. If the content is true, it will be another Toyota car that is not known to the outside world.
A lot of information on this incident has spread to the market level. Some analysts believe that Toyota Motor must pay the price it deserves, which is inconsistent with the status of the world’s largest automaker. There are also queries that question the purpose of this move. In any case, it is certain that Toyota Motor is in great trouble.
In the history of Toyota Motors, such a crisis of credibility has never been encountered, and prior to the worldwide recall events have occurred frequently. In response to various queries, Toyota Motor has always denied it. When Toyota's successor Akio Toyoda returned to power and decided to rebuild the new Toyota, it was robbed of it.
That thank-you letter to Biller
Toyota Motors quickly countered that Buller had violated his professional conduct. Who is the reputation event in the end? However, the authenticity of the incident itself is more concerned with tens of millions of Toyota Motor users.
"Inaccurate and deceptive." This is the definition of the publicly-reported Le lawsuit by the Toyota Motor North America Corporation through e-mail. In the view of Toyota Motor North America, Biller violated his professional ethics. All legal records were secret, and the protection of confidential intelligence information was an agreement between both parties, and Biller first broke the contract.
On April 15, 2003, Buhler joined Toyota Motor Corp. as a member of the National Management Council investigating the Toyota Rollover Incident. According to his complaint, after joining, he discovered that Toyota Motors was not as beautiful as the outside world and that the electronic information technology that Toyota could provide was unusually scarce in the scope of its work. This will make it easier for operators to eliminate information that is unfavorable to Toyota.
Thus, he had an idea to make a reasonable plan for the Toyota overturn accident and reduce the human factors to determine the trueness of the accident. He has repeatedly made suggestions to the supervisory level of the company, but none have been adopted. However, this did not affect the progress of his work. According to information from Toyota U.S. companies, Biller’s work is done quite well. In 36 months, he successfully handled 12 cases.
On April 3, 2008, Charles Reynolds, Toyota’s US sales vice president and general counsel, stated in a letter to Biller: “From 2003 to 2007, you worked hard, devoted, and worked hard. The impeccable legal enforcement and trial skills, as well as the ability to judge high-level buildings, greatly reduced Toyota's compensation and lawsuits against Toyota's overturn accident."
In this letter, Charles Reynolds said that in the 36 months, the unique ability of the Buller challenge to be defensive has been fully demonstrated in 12 cases. “In your case, your extraordinary ability has earned you high praise. Every case has made Toyota fully demonstrated. In these 12 cases, you also showed your intelligence and courage.â€
But the enthusiastic affirmation did not hide the differences between the two sides. How to properly handle the attitude of accident information has always affected their hearts. Judging from the current information, this is the key to splitting the two parties.
On August 31, 2009, Eastern Time, Biller publicly stated that he had sue Toyota. He said that when he worked for Toyota Americas, he learned that the company had not been able to obtain relevant data from the relevant subsidiaries, he began to collect the data, and hoped to complete the previous idea. But the reality is that those data have been approved by Toyota America and have been destroyed. It involved 300 rollover accidents. His previous worries became a reality.
When he and the company executives became increasingly fierce, on September 17, 2007, Biller left and received a severance payment of $3.7 million. Biller believes that he was forced to leave.
After leaving the company, Biller received the letter from Reynolds. For both parties, Reynolds said: "The plan and concept you made for the Toyota overturn accident in 2003 and your efforts have saved Toyota a lot of money while also providing Toyota with a reliable and durable car. The factory has improved its reputation."
Reynolds said that the departure of Biller was a huge loss to Toyota America.
Toyota's roof hurricane does not start at the end of Qing Ping, but it is in people's hearts.
When Toyota Motor North America tried hard to extinguish the sensation, more problems followed. Many lawyers who have lawsuits with Toyota Motors have come out. They have many similarities with the incidents they are dealing with and Biller said. These later Bullers then took Toyota Motor North America one step further.
In 2002, a commercial vehicle produced by Toyota was involved in an accident and killed one person. After the incident, the families of the deceased brought Toyota and its subordinate industrial equipment company to court. The plaintiff believes that Toyota's defective vehicle is the main cause of the accident. Toyota, on the other hand, believes that this car accident was caused by improper operation of the consumer.
After a three-year trial, the judge in San Francisco presided over the matter and decided that Toyota Motor had concealed the true information and imposed a fine of 139,000 U.S. dollars. At that time, Toyota did not agree to the court's penalty, and things went through several twists and turns, but this Japanese car manufacturer did not change the fact that it distort the truth. Due to the small scope of the incident, it did not cause much concern. After Bille initiated the lawsuit, these old events were re-introduced to prove the credibility of Toyota Motor.
Biller Blaster is affecting more and more people's thinking.
According to reports in the U.S. media, if Buller said it is true, at least in the past 10 years, accidents related to Toyota's car rollover may be revisited. Although Toyota Motor North America has not announced the number of similar incidents, the fear it caused has suffocated everyone. "Oh, Scorpio, if all the lawyers in the United States are assembled, it is estimated that this matter may be possible to solve," said Rand Brown, an auto analyst at Detroit.
In 2003, Ennis, a 24-year-old, was in a roll-over accident driving a Camry, causing his quadriplegic paralysis. Later, she competed with Toyota Motor America for 4 years. By September 2007, the matter ended in private.
In August 2007, Basque in Canada was very sad. She could only live on her four limbs. Two years ago, she accidentally drove a Toyota Corolla and afterwards she took Toyota to court. Finally, the court condemned the final result of her disability due to insufficient roof design of the accident vehicle.
Similar cases are being released through various channels, with Biller’s lawsuit forming a huge siege to Toyota Motor America. Whether these cases need to be reviewed, it is difficult to have clear results.
An attorney who oversaw 20 Toyota accidents said in an interview with USA Today: “There is no doubt that Toyota Motor Corporation (United States company) did not produce correct evidence in court.†This made his work difficult. The lawsuits litigated by the lawyer mainly focused on the Toyota 4Runner SUV series.
This series of models is a strategic product introduced by Toyota Motor Corporation in 1984 and is also a pillar product in the SUV field. It is synonymous with the J12 platform and Prado sold in China. Of the 20 accidents, most of the problems were focused on the roof design and endurance of the car. Consumers who have entrusted lawyers to complain do not think that they are satisfied with at least their ability to withstand the roof.
Farm Drone Sprayer,25L Sprayer Drone,Spraying Drone Agriculture,Drone Spraying In Agriculture
Dongying Tianqi Technology Co., Ltd. , https://www.uav5.com